COMPARE GUIDE
Synthetic Red SpinelVSNatural Ruby
Side-by-side comparison of physical properties, fluorescence, and crystal system — to identify by observation.
- ◎ is higher in Natural Ruby, giving a numerical distinguishing point.
- ◎ is higher in Natural Ruby, giving a numerical distinguishing point.
- ◎ is higher in Natural Ruby, giving a numerical distinguishing point.
Note: properties whose numeric ranges do not overlap are auto-extracted. Both are measurable with a refractometer or heavy-liquid bath.
| Property | A: Synthetic Red Spinel | B: Natural Ruby | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refractive index (RI) | 1.727–1.735 | 1.762–1.770 | B higher |
| Specific gravity (SG) | 3.62–3.66 | 3.97–4.05 | B higher |
| Mohs hardness | 8.0 | 9.0 | B higher |
| Birefringence | — | 0.008 | — |
| Dispersion | — | — | — |
| Property | A: Synthetic Red Spinel | B: Natural Ruby |
|---|---|---|
| Crystal system | 等軸晶系 | 六方晶系（三方晶系） |
| Pleochroism | — | 強（紫赤・黄赤） |
| Chelsea filter | red | red |
| UV (long-wave) | strong (red) | strong (red) |
| UV (short-wave) | medium (red) | weak (red) |
◆nclusions, natural color zoning, dichroism, and the diagnostic chromium absorption with iron-related features. Synthetic red spinel is the wrong species (isotropic spinel rather than birefringent corundum) — easily separated at the refractometer in seconds.
Distinguishing tools
Tools that decide between Synthetic Red Spinel and Natural Ruby in practice.
Note: this page is auto-generated from published GIA / CGL reference values. Individual stones, treatments, and synthetics may fall outside these ranges. For a definitive identification, consult an accredited gem laboratory.